• Tudor Gold filed two court actions in British Columbia to protect mineral claims at its Treaty Creek project amid a land-use dispute with Seabridge Gold over Seabridge’s proposed Mitchell Treaty Twin Tunnels route.
• British Columbia permit reviewer for Seabridge’s tunnel amendment application declined to deliberate on it without greater legal certainty over interaction with Tudor’s overlapping mineral titles, according to an April 9 letter to Seabridge.
• One case, filed Sept. 22, 2025, challenges Province position that a conditional registration reserve applies to Tudor claims or can grant third-party rights.
• Second action, filed Oct. 3, 2025, seeks judicial review of decision granting Seabridge a license of occupation covering parts of Tudor’s claims.
• No hearing dates have been set; Tudor preference is negotiated resolution with Province of British Columbia and Seabridge.

Disclaimer: This news brief was created by Public Technologies (PUBT) using generative artificial intelligence. While PUBT strives to provide accurate and timely information, this AI-generated content is for informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as financial, investment, or legal advice. Tudor Gold Corp. published the original content used to generate this news brief on April 14, 2026, and is solely responsible for the information contained therein.